Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "H(dot)J(dot) Sanders" <hjs(at)rmax(dot)nl>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: 2006-10-12 14:44:20
Message-ID: 10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
> If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
> planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
> planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
> fix than an improvement).

Hmph. Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-12 15:14:39 Hints proposal
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-12 13:52:49 Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?