| From: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | ygloriau(at)siliage(dot)fr |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Prepared Statement limit ? |
| Date: | 2002-10-29 16:13:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1035907986.1716.65.camel@inspiron.cramers |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Yann
Which version of the driver are you using.
Looking at the latest code, the statement is parsed and the number of
parameters are set based on the number of ? marks in the statement. Are
you sure it is the number of parameters or actually the 51 st parameter
that is causing the problem.
Dave
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 10:35, ygloriau(at)siliage(dot)fr wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
> I'm dealing with the hugest query i've ever seen : 93 parameters !
>
> The problem is that i got an exception when i try to add the 51th parameter.
> No way to have mor ethan 50 parameters.
> Is there a solution to fix up this problem ?
> (I won't rewrite the query !)
>
> thanks
>
> Yann
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ygloriau | 2002-10-29 16:23:03 | Re: Prepared Statement limit ? |
| Previous Message | ygloriau | 2002-10-29 15:35:42 | Prepared Statement limit ? |