vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I agree with your analysis to remove that test. Attached patch has the
> changes for the same.
Is there any value in converting the test case into a TAP test that
could be more flexible about the expected output? I'm mainly wondering
whether there are any code paths that this test forces the server through,
which would otherwise lack coverage.
regards, tom lane