From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: index theory |
Date: | 2002-10-16 15:47:00 |
Message-ID: | 1034783220.6641.29.camel@taru.tm.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak kirjutas K, 16.10.2002 kell 15:19:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have SQL query:
>
> SELECT * FROM ii WHERE i1='a' AND i2='b';
>
> There're indexes on i1 and i2. I know best solution is use one
> index on both (i1, i2).
>
> The EXPLAIN command show that optimalizer wants to use one index:
>
> test=# explain SELECT * FROM ii WHERE i1='a' AND i1='b';
> QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Index Scan using i1 on ii (cost=0.00..4.83 rows=1 width=24)
> Index Cond: ((i1 = 'a'::character varying) AND (i1 = 'b'::character varying))
>
>
> It's right and I undererstand why not use both indexes. But I talked
> about it with one Oracle user and he said me Oracle knows use both indexes
> and results from both index scans are mergeted to final result -- this is maybe
> used if full access to table (too big rows?) is more expensive than 2x index
> scan and final merge. Is in PG possible something like this?
There has been some talk about using bitmaps generated from indexes as
an intermediate step.
----------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Walker | 2002-10-16 16:33:35 | Re: Vacuum improvement |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-16 15:05:40 | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |