Re: Postgresql and multithreading

From: Tycho Fruru <tycho(at)fruru(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <rtreat(at)webmd(dot)net>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha(at)lklug(dot)pdn(dot)ac(dot)lk>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, anuradha(at)gnu(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Date: 2002-10-16 14:50:35
Message-ID: 1034779835.1219.36.camel@kungfoo.conostix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 16:37, Robert Treat wrote:

> I'm pretty sure BSD allows you to relicense derived code as you see fit.
> However, any derived project that was released GPL would have a hell of
> a time ever getting put back into the main source (short of
> relicensing).

Exactly. This is one of the reasons why BSD license is very much liked
by proprietary software vendors (think MSFT), unlike the GPL which
doesn't allow someone to change and redistribute their work with
restrictive licenses.

Cheers,
Tycho

(BTW: I'm not asking to change the license of Postgresql, I know the -
dogmatic - answer to that one. So please don't misunderstand my mail)

--
Tycho Fruru tycho(at)fruru(dot)com
"Prediction is extremely difficult. Especially about the future."
- Niels Bohr

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-16 14:56:31 Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
Previous Message Robert Treat 2002-10-16 14:37:02 Re: Postgresql and multithreading