Re: Postgresql and multithreading

From: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, anuradha(at)gnu(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Date: 2002-10-16 14:21:54
Message-ID: 1034778114.2517.1388.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 01:27, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Well, slow adoption rate is attributed to 'apache 1.3.x is good enough for us'
> syndrome, as far as I can see from news. Once linux distros start shipping with
> apache 2.x series *only*, the upgrade cycle will start rolling, I guess.

I think that's part of it. I think the other part is that by the time
you're getting to huge r/s numbers, typical web site bandwidth is
already used up. So, what's the point in adding more breathing room
when you don't have the bandwidth to use it anyways.

Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2002-10-16 14:30:01 Re: Vacuum improvement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-16 14:17:34 Re: Vacuum improvement