Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset

Michael,

You are correct, commit will effectively close the cursor.

This is the only way to deal with large result sets however.

Dave
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 10:44, Michael Paesold wrote:
> Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > No disadvantage, in fact that is what we would like to do.
> >
> >
> > setFetchSize(size) turns on cursor support, otherwise fetch normally
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 10:30, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> > > What would be the disadvantage of making the JDBC driver use a
> > > cursor under the covers (always)? Is it significantly slower or more
> > > resource-intensive than fetching all the data at once? Certainly it
> seems
> > > like it would save memory in some cases.
> > >
> > > Aaron
>
> Well, using a cursor based result set *always* is not going to work. Cursors
> will not be held over a commit, whereas a buffer result set will. So the
> setFetchSize..
>
> Regards,
> Michael Paesold
>
>