Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...

On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 01:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Given what Tom has posted regarding the standard, I think Oracle
> > is wrong. I'm wondering how the others handle multiple
> > references in CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in a single stored
> > procedure/function invocation. It seems to me that the lower
> > bound is #4, not #5, and the upper bound is implementation
> > dependent. Therefore PostgreSQL is in compliance, but its
> > compliance is not very popular.
>
> I don't see how we can be compliant if SQL92 says:
>
> The time of evaluation of the <datetime value function> during the
> execution of the SQL-statement is implementation-dependent.
>
> It says it has to be "during the SQL statement", or is SQL statement
> also ambiguous?

It can be, as "during the SQL statement" can mean either the single
statement inside the PL/SQL function (SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP INTO
time1 FROM DUAL;) or the whole invocation of the Pl/SQL funtion (the /
command in Mikes sample, i believe)

--------------
Hannu