Re: [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility
Date: 2005-08-29 15:42:46
Message-ID: 10327.1125330166@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Speaking of said psql's columnar representations, what about the
> alignment thing proposed earlier where an embedded newline doesn't
> mess up the alignment of everything else? Is there some generic way
> to handle this?

If that's not on TODO already, it certainly should be --- but again,
I don't see that happening for 8.1. We've lived with it for years
so it hardly counts as "must fix for 8.1".

Were you thinking of proposing a multiline output format for \df when
there are named parameters? We could plan on doing that in 8.2,
assuming someone steps up to fix the formatting code by then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey E. Koposov 2005-08-29 16:20:11 Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-08-29 15:36:55 Re: [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-29 15:44:59 Re: be-secure.c patch
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-08-29 15:36:55 Re: [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility