| From: | Thomas O'Dowd <tom(at)nooper(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mihai Gheorghiu <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Help! |
| Date: | 2002-09-18 02:02:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1032314534.17720.2845.camel@beast.uwillsee.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Are you using the Java driver to read the timestamp? If so there should
be no change required if you are using ResultSet.getTimestamp() method.
Tom.
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 23:26, Mihai Gheorghiu wrote:
> I migrated to 7.2.2 with only speed issues in view.
> When trying to run the actual application, I discovered the changes in the
> time functions area (timestamp with precision and current).
> Is there a way to set that p precision parameter of timestamp once and for
> all, so that timestamp returns in the old format (no decimals after second)
> and the application developer does not have to make changes to at least 250
> java files?
> Thanks everybody for your support.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-09-18 04:43:07 | Re: [HACKERS] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-09-18 01:17:47 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.3: help on new CREATE TYPE |