| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg(at)dmi(dot)dk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: full outer performance problem |
| Date: | 2005-05-10 14:45:42 |
| Message-ID: | 10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg(at)dmi(dot)dk> writes:
> I have two BIG tables (virtually identical) with 3 NOT NULL columns
> Station_id, TimeObs, Temp_XXXX, with indexes on (Station_id, TimeObs)
> and valid ANALYSE (set statistics=100). I want to join the two tables
> with a FULL OUTER JOIN.
I'm confused. If the columns are NOT NULL, why isn't this a valid
transformation of your original query?
> select temp_max_60min,temp_dry_at_2m
> from station s natural join
> temp_dry_at_2m a full outer join temp_max_60min b using (station_id, timeobs)
> where s.wmo_id=6065
> and _a.timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0' and b._timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0'
> and '2004-1-1 0:0:0' between s.startdate and s.enddate;
Seems like it's not eliminating any rows that would otherwise succeed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Haberlach | 2005-05-10 15:02:50 | Re: Partitioning / Clustering |
| Previous Message | John A Meinel | 2005-05-10 14:41:05 | Re: Partitioning / Clustering |