Re: full outer performance problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg(at)dmi(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full outer performance problem
Date: 2005-05-10 14:45:42
Message-ID: 10318.1115736342@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Kim Bisgaard <kib+pg(at)dmi(dot)dk> writes:
> I have two BIG tables (virtually identical) with 3 NOT NULL columns
> Station_id, TimeObs, Temp_XXXX, with indexes on (Station_id, TimeObs)
> and valid ANALYSE (set statistics=100). I want to join the two tables
> with a FULL OUTER JOIN.

I'm confused. If the columns are NOT NULL, why isn't this a valid
transformation of your original query?

> select temp_max_60min,temp_dry_at_2m
> from station s natural join
> temp_dry_at_2m a full outer join temp_max_60min b using (station_id, timeobs)
> where s.wmo_id=6065
> and _a.timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0' and b._timeobs='2004-1-1 0:0:0'
> and '2004-1-1 0:0:0' between s.startdate and s.enddate;

Seems like it's not eliminating any rows that would otherwise succeed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Haberlach 2005-05-10 15:02:50 Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Previous Message John A Meinel 2005-05-10 14:41:05 Re: Partitioning / Clustering