From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
Date: | 2008-09-29 12:46:46 |
Message-ID: | 10307.1222692406@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ... That kinda works, but the problem is that restartpoints are time based,
> not log based. We need them to be deterministic for us to rely upon them
> in the above way.
Right, but the performance disadvantages of making them strictly
log-distance-based are pretty daunting. We don't really want slaves
doing that while they're in catchup mode.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-09-29 12:54:10 | Re: Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-09-29 12:42:04 | Re: [REVIEW] Prototype: In-place upgrade v02 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-29 13:53:28 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-29 12:33:16 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |