Re: Question about our postgres-related product

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Bo <koester(at)x-itec(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about our postgres-related product
Date: 2002-08-29 18:08:42
Message-ID: 1030644522.3235.99.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I think an initial announcement to the pgsql-general group would not be
a problem, though future postings should probably go to pgsql-announce

Robert Treat

On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 12:16, Boris Köster wrote:
> Hello pgsql-general,
>
> we are developers of the X-ITEC CMS/R Content-Management System and
> our system uses postgresql now a very long time. Our product is
> open-source as of 09/2002 (development now 2 years) and I would like to know if it is allowed
> to send a note about this to the list and where to download the
> product (currently only german version available).
>
> I ask because there is another cms vendor here who is promoting
> nearly every version of their cms and I would like to know if this
> is allowed or not and if we could send a note about our industrial
> quality cms (it´s a cms mainly for companies) or not. Our product is
> used in big companies in germany and it´s developed with
> quality-goals in front. We would never send spam or unwanted things
> to a list, so I ask before I do anything wrong.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Boris Köster mailto:koester(at)x-itec(dot)de
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2002-08-29 18:11:42 Re: [Pgreplication-general] Master/Slave is in town!
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-08-29 18:05:25 Re: [SQL] Why must the function that a trigger calls return "opaque" ???