Re: Proposed GUC Variable

From: Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Date: 2002-08-23 07:54:57
Message-ID: 1030089298.6880.2.camel@saphir
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 04:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> * Add GUC parameter to print queries that generate errors

Maybe don't make that an option, but rather do it always. I don't see
where that would hurt. And killing configuration options that are
unneeded is always a Good Thing.

--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-08-23 08:20:59 Re: pgstattuple change using SRF
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-23 06:46:50 Re: Proposed GUC Variable

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-23 09:13:08 Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-23 06:46:50 Re: Proposed GUC Variable