From: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Shahbaz A Chaudhary <chaudhar(at)umich(dot)edu> |
Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: precompiled jdbc with DataSource...why not? |
Date: | 2002-08-19 09:20:50 |
Message-ID: | 1029748850.1884.185.camel@inspiron.cramers |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
If you go to jdbc.postgresql.org. you should find a driver which has
them compiled in.
Either way the source in cvs compiles in jdk1.4 now.
Dave
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 05:12, Shahbaz A Chaudhary wrote:
> After working almost constantly for the past two days and nights (mostly
> searching web/mail archives for answers, I understand following is the
> 'DataSource' situation:
> -DataSource is not available for download from anywhere, it must be
> compiled with javax.sql.* in classpath
> -The driver won't compile at all if one has JDK 1.4 (I have 1.4_01)
>
> Unfortunately, I would like to use JSP's JSTL SQL (tag library..with
> tomcat as app server) which only accepts datasources.
>
> It seems like someone compiling a driver with datasource stuff built into
> it (even if it is marked as 'beta') and making it available will solve
> LOTS of problems.
>
> Is there a problem with this solution? If so, can someone suggest an
> alternative please?
>
> btw: I tried another pg jdbc driver but that is giving me a whole
> different set of problems. Thanks.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Felipe Schnack | 2002-08-19 12:41:56 | Stored procedures |
Previous Message | Shahbaz A Chaudhary | 2002-08-19 09:12:29 | precompiled jdbc with DataSource...why not? |