| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Standard replication interface? |
| Date: | 2002-08-15 14:05:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1029420348.31583.51.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Well, that's a different issue. ;)
I initially wanted to get feedback to see if anyone else thought the
concept might hold some merit.
I take it from your answer you think it might...but are scratching your
head wondering exactly what it entails...
Greg
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 22:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> writes:
> > ... it occurred to me that a predefined set of views
> > and/or tables for all replication implementations may be worthwhile.
>
> Do we understand replication well enough to define such a set of views?
> I sure don't ...
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2002-08-15 14:28:29 | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-15 14:02:51 | Re: contrib Makefiles |