Re: NAMEDATALEN going to 64

From: Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NAMEDATALEN going to 64
Date: 2002-08-13 19:09:33
Message-ID: 1029265774.1795.29.camel@inspiron.cramers
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

I doubt there is much to do.

Dave
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 15:06, Barry Lind wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Will do.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >I am making changes to jdbc to allow 63-byte object names. If this has
> >to be done somehow in a version-independent way, would someone fix it
> >for me once I apply the patches? Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-08-13 19:25:52 Re: Hardware Tuning
Previous Message Barry Lind 2002-08-13 19:06:48 Re: NAMEDATALEN going to 64