From: | "Robert M(dot) Meyer" <rmeyer(at)installs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | nickf(at)ontko(dot)com, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Leftover processes on shutdown - Debian+JDBC |
Date: | 2002-08-13 16:36:22 |
Message-ID: | 1029256582.28282.38.camel@skymaster |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc |
Hmmm... You're right. How much longer does a '-m fast' take. The
reason I ask is because during a server shutdown, init doesn't wait
around long after the script exits. The problem with not using the '-m'
is that pg_ctl returns quickly but the DB may not be down, causing the
system to pull the rug out from under it.
Cheers!
Bob
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Robert M. Meyer" <rmeyer(at)installs(dot)com> writes:
> > I had the same problem. I rewrote my shutdown script to call 'pg_ctl -m
> > immediate'. So far, I haven't seen any damage because of it
>
> A much safer choice would be "-m fast".
>
> The default ("-m smart") doesn't shut down the server until all clients
> voluntarily disconnect. If you have tomcat holding persistent
> connections open then that's not what you want.
>
> "-m fast" forcibly disconnects clients and then does a clean database
> shutdown. This is generally what you want if you have
> persistent-connection clients.
>
> "-m immediate" is the equivalent of the big red EMERGENCY STOP button
> found in places like power plant control rooms. If you are in the habit
> of hitting that as a routine measure, you need to have your operator's
> permit revoked.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Robert M. Meyer
Sr. Network Administrator
DigiVision Satellite Services
14 Lafayette Sq, Ste 410
Buffalo, NY 14203-1904
(716)332-1451
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-13 16:38:03 | Re: performance tuning: shared_buffers, sort_mem; swap |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-13 16:27:55 | Re: performance tuning: shared_buffers, sort_mem; swap |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-13 16:50:19 | Re: Leftover processes on shutdown - Debian+JDBC |
Previous Message | Nick Fankhauser | 2002-08-13 16:20:48 | Re: Leftover processes on shutdown - Debian+JDBC |