| From: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-08-13 01:51:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1029203472.1653.4.camel@miles.debisschop.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 21:28, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I'm going to now go to the lagging plane -- building newer PostgreSQL for
> older Red Hat (and maybe others, if I can get enough hard drives available).
> The source RPM will still be useful to the newer distribution's maintainers
> -- but the requests I see more of on the lists is newer PostgreSQL on older
> linux. So I'm going to try to rise to that occassion, and take this
> opportunity to apologize for not seeing it sooner.
>
> I welcome comments on this change of focus.
Even though we run redhat on our systems, as close to stock as we can, I
have found that your RPMs build more reliably than Trond's.
My bad for being unable to diagnose the build problems with the RedHat
SRPM, my double-bad for letting that failure prevent my reporting the
issu to him.
But I for one will miss your lead on the bleeding edge of RPM
development.
--
Karl DeBisschop
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-08-13 02:33:19 | Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2002-08-13 01:48:20 | Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more |