From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Another python patch -- minor |
Date: | 2002-08-08 12:23:55 |
Message-ID: | 1028809436.18932.55.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hmm. That maybe. I've yet to sit down and try to fully understand the
relations in the system tables. I simply grep'd for pg_attribute and
added a check for "and attisdropped = 'f'".
In each case, I did attempt to run the modified queries to ensure they
still executed and compared the resulting output against the unmodified
queries, however, it doesn't mean I groked what it was really trying to
do.
If you do find corrections to be made, please let me know as I'd love to
know where, what, and why I messed up so I can learn from my mistakes.
Seems the only system tables ERD I have, I find rather hard to
read...guess that will be on my list of items to do today...find a good
ERD of the system tables.
Greg
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 23:00, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> You should be submitting all these patches to the pgsql-patches mailing
> list...
>
> I will look at your attisdropped patch a bit more carefully as I think some
> of the exclusions you've put in aren't necessary...
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Greg Copeland
> > Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2002 11:50 AM
> > To: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Another python patch -- minor
> >
> >
> > This fixes some text as well as enforces the use of "drop table cascade"
> > since we moved from an implicate to explicate implementation.
> >
> > Please find attached the func.py patch.
> >
> > Sorry these are not all one single patch. I really hadn't planned on
> > doing all this...especially not tonight. ;)
> >
> > Greg Copeland
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-08-08 12:57:41 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-08-08 11:32:17 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |