From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Mark Mielke" <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT ... SELECT ... FOR SHARED? |
Date: | 2008-04-21 13:48:47 |
Message-ID: | 10288.1208785727@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The lack of regression tests covering this area is a bit annoying
>> at this point. However, it's hard to see how to test FOR UPDATE
>> until we get some concurrent-sessions support in psql.
> Well, end-to-end testing would e better but we can test that the locks are
> at least being recorded by white-box inspection:
> postgres=# select distinct age(xmax) from tellers;
Huh, that's a cute trick ... and it would answer the immediate problem,
which is to check that the statement did take the row locks it was
supposed to.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-21 13:52:11 | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-21 13:43:47 | Re: TODO, FAQs to Wiki? |