Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Date: 2002-08-02 11:10:47
Message-ID: 1028286647.14587.34.camel@taru.tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 05:39, Curt Sampson wrote:
> Because SQL99 is non-relational in many ways, so I guess they
> figured making it non-relational in one more way can't hurt.
>
> I mean come on, this is a language which started out not even
> relationally complete!

Could you point me to some pure relational languages ?

Preferrably not pure academic at the same time ;)

BTW, what other parts of SQL do you consider non-relational (and thus
candidates for dropping) ?

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-02 11:34:21 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-02 11:07:56 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?