From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martin Renters <martin(at)datafax(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachability |
Date: | 2002-04-03 17:24:37 |
Message-ID: | 10279.1017854677@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Martin Renters <martin(at)datafax(dot)com> writes:
> It is also pretty unreasonable to think that any company is
> going to switch providers because of one blacklist or somehow complain
> to their ISP about the spammers the ISP is hosting without any more
> detail than:
> "Blacklist X says you provide spam support and/or have too many
> spammers on your network. Please remove them so I can send
> my email."
FWIW, all the blacklists I use (and 510sg is only the first line of
defense ;-)) have documentation available about the reasons for listing
IP blocks. F'r instance, looking up Thomas' IP I get:
xo.com.spam-support.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 23h32m50s IN TXT "added 2002-01-05; spam support - dns server at 64.1.121.57 supporting http://www.poxteam2001.com"
xo.com.spam-support.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 23h32m50s IN TXT "added 2002-01-07; spam support - dns server at 64.1.121.57 supporting http://compower.numberop.com"
xo.com.spam-support.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 23h32m50s IN TXT "added 2002-03-07; spam support - hosting http://207.88.179.193 - terminated"
xo.com.spam-support.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 23h32m50s IN TXT "added 2002-03-10; spam support - hosting http://thecottagemonitor.com"
xo.com.spam-support.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 23h32m50s IN TXT "added 2002-03-13; spam support - hosting http://shortcuts2learning.com"
xo.com.spam-support.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 23h32m50s IN TXT "added 2002-03-24; spam support - hosting http://209.164.32.75/consumer_first_funding"
But this is getting pretty far off-topic for the PG lists.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-03 17:38:06 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-03 17:16:41 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-03 17:30:51 | Re: Locale support is now on by default |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-03 17:16:41 | Re: Suggestions please: names for function cachabilityattributes |