Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance

Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco(at)prospectiv(dot)com> writes:
> pg_dw=# explain CREATE TABLE ecr_opens with (FILLFACTOR=100)
> pg_dw-# as
> pg_dw-# select o.emailcampaignid, count(memberid) opencnt
> pg_dw-# from openactivity o,ecr_sents s
> pg_dw-# where s.emailcampaignid = o.emailcampaignid
> pg_dw-# group by o.emailcampaignid;
> QUERY
> PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> GroupAggregate (cost=0.00..1788988.05 rows=9939 width=12)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..1742467.24 rows=9279316 width=12)
> -> Index Scan using ecr_sents_ecid_idx on ecr_sents s
> (cost=0.00..38.59 rows=479 width=4)
> -> Index Scan using openact_emcamp_idx on openactivity o
> (cost=0.00..3395.49 rows=19372 width=12)
> Index Cond: (o.emailcampaignid = s.emailcampaignid)
> (5 rows)

> Should this query be hashing the smaller table on Postgres rather than
> using nested loops?

Yeah, seems like it. Just for testing purposes, do "set enable_nestloop
= 0" and see what plan you get then.

regards, tom lane