Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
Date: 2023-10-12 14:34:35
Message-ID: 1025797.1697121275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Please advise on the idea of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade, in
> a way like relfilenodes, type id and so on. What are possible downsides of
> such a solution?

You have the burden of proof backwards. That would add a great deal
of new mechanism, and you haven't provided even one reason why it'd
be worth doing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2023-10-12 14:41:39 Re: odd buildfarm failure - "pg_ctl: control file appears to be corrupt"
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-10-12 14:26:28 Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification