| From: | Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tony <tony(at)animaproductions(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: read this and puke |
| Date: | 2002-06-13 19:21:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1023996070.4705.15.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
All well and good, but from what I have seen and heard with Postgresql,
it is quietly and effectively running very large and complex jobs that
MySQL cannot touch.
As I was saying to my co-workers recently... is is one of the best truly
*active* database servers out there. We recently switched everything to
Postgersql from Mysql and were wondering why we didn't do it before.
Still... it would be nice to do some more marketing... a better, more
colorful, flashier Postgresql site perhaps? (I volunteer)
- Ericson Smith
eric(at)did-it(dot)com
http://www.did-it.com
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 15:05, tony wrote:
> http://r.hotwired.com/r/wn_html_link/http://www.wired.com/news/linux/0,1411,53006,00.html
>
> MySQL a dangerous competitor to Oracle...
>
> Guys we need a marketing department!!! Or I'll just move the application
> running my nulcear power station to MySQL...
>
> Tony
> --
> RedHat Linux on Sony Vaio C1XD/S
> http://www.animaproductions.com/linux2.html
> Macromedia UltraDev with PostgreSQL
> http://www.animaproductions.com/ultra.html
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-13 19:22:59 | Re: read this and puke |
| Previous Message | tony | 2002-06-13 19:05:51 | read this and puke |