From: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | russell(at)coker(dot)com(dot)au |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Bug#149056: postgresql: should not try in a busy loop when allocating resources]] |
Date: | 2002-06-09 02:53:24 |
Message-ID: | 1023591204.31149.11954.camel@linda |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Russell, can you provide a test case, or at least explain the
circumstances, please. Please maintain the Cc list.
-----Forwarded Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Bug#149056: postgresql: should not try in a busy loop when allocating resources]
Date: 08 Jun 2002 22:03:33 -0400
Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> forwards:
> When trying to create a semaphore Postgresql 7.2.1-3 will try 400,000 times=
> per
> second if it has problems.
AFAICS it will try *once* and abort if it fails. Can you provide a
reproducible test case for the above behavior?
regards, tom lane
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my
word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath
everlasting life, and shall not come into
condemnation; but is passed from death unto life."
John 5:24
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-06-09 05:17:10 | Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-06-09 02:32:04 | Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API |