| From: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug |
| Date: | 2002-05-21 22:09:58 |
| Message-ID: | 1022018998.1400.320.camel@linda |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 18:24, Lamar Owen wrote:
> In any case, this isn't just a Red Hat problem, as it's going to cause
> problems with the use of timestamps on ANY glibc 2.2.5 dist. That's more
> than Red Hat, by a large margin.
I'm running glibc 2.2.5 on Debian and all regression tests pass OK (with
make check). I don't see any note in the glibc Debian changelog about
reversing an upstream change to mktime().
I missed the first messages in this thread and I can't find them in the
archive. What should I be looking for to see if I have the problem you
have encountered or to see why I don't have it if I ought to have?
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"O come, let us worship and bow down; let us kneel
before the LORD our maker." Psalms 95:6
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2002-05-21 22:47:05 | Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug |
| Previous Message | Gaston Micheri | 2002-05-21 21:24:38 | Graphical Tool |