Re: pg_dump and languages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump and languages
Date: 2004-11-26 18:26:59
Message-ID: 10213.1101493619@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> I used the pg_dump from Postgres 8.0beta5 to dump the data from a version
> 7.4.0 database. Both databases are located on SuSE Linux machines. The
> pg_restore to the 8.0 version went very well with the exception of the
> languages. I have plpgsql and plsh installed in the 7.4.0 database. pg_dump
> handled the dependencies for plpgsql alright but not for plsh. Searching the
> archives showed a previous problem with languages installed to pg_catalog
> which is were plsh is installed. However, I thought this had been solved. Is
> this correct? The other thought that occurred to me is that plsh is an
> untrusted language. I am dumping and restoring as user postgres so my
> understanding is that this should overcome any permissions issues. Again am I
> correct in thinking this?

This would be a more useful report had you said exactly what the problem
was ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-11-26 18:34:54 Re: PostgreSQL slow after VACUUM
Previous Message j0rd1 adame 2004-11-26 18:24:43 Error after adding Foreign Keys