From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Issues tangential to win32 support |
Date: | 2002-05-09 20:15:02 |
Message-ID: | 1020975306.2451.76.camel@rh72.home.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 02:33, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> It took a few hundred man hours to do it.
About 2-8 weeks for one full time programmer ?
> I see the whole Win32 port as
> a non issue. Several parties have already completed it (including the
> place where I work -- CONNX Solutions Inc.). If we did not do it or all
> parties who already did it were hit by a comet or something, someone
> else would accomplish it. It isn't trivial but it isn't impossible
> either. If a need is large enough, someone will manage it. The need is
> large enough. Ergo...
Do you know which of these run ((reasonably) well) on win9x ?
> Here are some other things related:
>
> A ready to go Win32 PosgreSQL package:
> http://www.dbexperts.net/postgresql
Perhaps we should back up and let dbexperts et.al. recover their costs
and after that repent and commit changes back to main tree ;)
## insert a little ad-hominem attack to everyone objecting a native
## win32 port as owning stock in some win32-pg-selling company
BTW, do they have an evaluation version or do they think that people
would in that case evaluate on win32 and then buy a cheap linux box for
$495.- :)
--------------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Iavor Raytchev | 2002-05-09 20:24:00 | www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw it) |
Previous Message | Valentine Zaretsky | 2002-05-09 20:13:50 | Re: troubleshooting pointers |