Re: Issues tangential to win32 support

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues tangential to win32 support
Date: 2002-05-09 19:17:24
Message-ID: 1020971844.2080.36.camel@rh72.home.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 00:09, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 22:51, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > > There are some issues that the whole idea of a win32 port should bring up.
> > > One of them is whether or not postgresql should be rewritten as a
> > > multi-threaded app.
> >
> > Please, don't add this one to it.
> >
> > I'm all for the native Windows port, yes, but I've discussed
> > the multi-thread questions for days at Great Bridge, then
> > again with my new employer, with people on shows and whatnot.
> >
> > Anything in the whole backend is designed with a multi-
> > process model in mind. You'll not do that in any reasonable
> > amount of time.
>
> IIRC you are replying to the man who _has_ actually don this ?

Sorry, mistaken identity. I meant Myron scott ( mkscott(at)sacadia(dot)com )

who has made this http://sourceforge.net/projects/mtpgsql

> Perhaps using an unreasonable amount of time but still ... :)
>
> ----------
> Hannu
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-05-09 19:20:23 Re: PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-05-09 19:09:58 Re: Issues tangential to win32 support