From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Behavior of negative OFFSET |
Date: | 2011-11-08 04:30:46 |
Message-ID: | 10194.1320726646@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/7/11, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I've been using a query on Postgres 8.4 with a negative OFFSET, which
>>> works fine:
>>> SELECT DISTINCT s.* FROM s WHERE ... ORDER BY s.bday ASC, s.name
>>> ASC LIMIT 15 OFFSET -15
>> the original behavior was undefined.
> What do it do in reality? I'm debugging a legacy app which used it.
It used to treat negative offsets/limits as zero.
> Also: Is there any reference in the docs to this? I wasn't able to find this.
The 8.4 release notes mention
* Disallow negative LIMIT or OFFSET values, rather than treating them as zero (Simon)
I'm pretty sure this changed in 8.4, not since then.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-11-08 05:44:53 | Re: Custom Constraint Violation Errors |
Previous Message | Mohamed Hashim | 2011-11-08 03:21:35 | Re: Performance Problem with postgresql 9.03, 8GB RAM,Quadcore Processor Server--Need help!!!!!!! |