Re: command.c breakup

From: John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: command.c breakup
Date: 2002-04-12 08:48:34
Message-ID: 1018601317.16538.71.camel@adzuki
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 03:33, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Fine. I'll work on that basis. I'll prepare a full-blown patch which can
> > be applied Monday -unless anyone else is sitting on uncommitted changes
> > to the directory that they want me to wait for?
>
> Nothing important. Shall I suggest that you do the rearrangement first, and
> then once everything's happy, we can work on removing redundant code?
>

I think this is the right thing to do. Rearranging files shouldn't have
any effect on behaviour, but the removal of redundant code (e.g. for
permissions checks) may result in discussions about the appropriate
permissions for different activities -ISTM that this should be open to
normal discussion and review.

John

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-04-12 08:59:16 Re: Bidirectional hard joins (fwd)
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-04-12 08:35:52 Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate