From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument? |
Date: | 2002-03-21 05:19:47 |
Message-ID: | 1016687988.4573.1.camel@jiro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) writes:
> >> If we're going to change the structure anyway, let's fix it to be
> >> independent of NAMEDATALEN.
>
> > Sounds good. If we're making other backwards-incompatible changes to
> > pgNotify, one thing that bugs me about the API is the use of "relname"
> > to refer to name of the NOTIFY/LISTEN condition.
>
> I hear you ... but my proposal only requires a recompile, *not* any
> source code changes. Renaming the field would break client source code.
> I doubt it's worth that.
Okay, that's fair -- I'll leave it as it is.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-03-21 06:51:38 | Re: mysql migration |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-21 05:16:52 | Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-03-21 05:51:52 | FW: Help with SET NULL/SET NOT NULL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-21 05:16:52 | Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument? |