Re: more about pg_toast growth

From: "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more about pg_toast growth
Date: 2002-03-15 18:35:38
Message-ID: 1016217338.12395.42.camel@heat
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 06:47, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:16, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you sure you're B64-encoding the gzipped text?
> >
> > I am positive:
> >
> > rupert=# select substr(body, 0, 200) from resp_body where resp = (select
> > max(resp) from resp_body);
> >
> > eJztfXt34riy799hrf4OGuZMJ1k3BL949SScRQhJmCbAAbp7z75zV5bAAjxtbI5tkjB75rvfkiwb
> > GxxDHt0dgvtBjC2VpFLVr6qkknMydiZ6+WRMsFo+6dV7jVqZnOE5ami2oxkjG31ALWdMLLgxIIZN
> > UFvHDrFPsm7Z1MmEOBiNHWeaIf87025P07X7qWYRO40Gp
>
> Hmmm, that doesn't decode to a gzip compressed steam. But it
> doesn't decode to readable text either, so I have no clue
> what you encoded. Note that the pronounciation in the above
> question was on "gzipped", not on "B64-encoding".

You can't just throw a gzipped stream into a file and try to gunzip it.
I'm positive the data is gzipped, then base-64 encoded, because I use
this exact code to get it in there:

# Insert the response body if any

$zbody = MIME::Base64::encode_base64(Compress::Zlib::compress($resp->content()));

$sth = $dbh->prepare(qq{
INSERT INTO resp_body (resp, body) VALUES ($id, ?)
});
$sth->execute($zbody);

And I use the inverse to retrieve it.

> > I have increased the free space map and will be able to restart the
> > postmaster today at around midnight GMT.
>
> Any news?

I couldn't work it in to the last maintenance window. I'll give it
another run tonight.

Thanks again,
Jeffrey

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Tkach 2002-03-15 19:07:44 Why is it not using an index?
Previous Message Gregory Wood 2002-03-15 18:28:04 Re: Why is it not using an index?