From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tablespaces |
Date: | 2004-06-20 21:28:41 |
Message-ID: | 10153.1087766921@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I've reviewed your patch by eye, but can't see anything in your patch
> about relocating the pg_xlog directory.
I see no reasonable way to move pg_xlog while the postmaster is up.
So this is something that will always require outside-the-database
activity. We could maybe offer a script to do it, but I can't see
any fundamental advantage there over telling people how to do it by
hand.
> There was/is a TODO item:
> - Allow xlog directory location to be specified during initdb, perhaps
> using symlinks
Note this says "during initdb", which is a whole different ballgame.
We could certainly add a "symlink pg_xlog to foo" switch to initdb,
but again, just how much functionality is that really adding?
Not a whole lot. (I'll not stand in the way if someone wants to write
and document such a switch in the next ten days; but really the bang
for buck ratio seems low, compared to working on things that you can't
do nohow in current PG.)
> AFAICS, pg_xlog could be treated as the name of a tablespace, rather
> than as a fixed directory beneath PGDATA.
Definitely not. pg_xlog is *not* a tablespace. xlog activity happens
below the level at which it is reasonable to pay attention to tablespaces.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-06-20 21:29:07 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-20 21:18:48 | Re: nested xacts and phantom Xids |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-06-20 21:29:07 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-20 21:18:48 | Re: nested xacts and phantom Xids |