> On 27/01/2023 01:48 CET Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/23 15:55, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> >
> > There are arguments against sequential PK, e.g. they give away too much info and
> > allow attacks such as forced browsing[2]. The first I can understand: you may
> > not want to reveal the number of users or customers. But access control should
> > prevent forced browsing.
>
> Shouldn't your application layer isolate the users from the database? UUIDs
> are all over the DBs I manage, but the PKs are all sequences.
Yes, I meant the application layer, not Postgres' access control.
--
Erik