Re: autovacuum_work_mem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Date: 2013-12-11 20:40:18
Message-ID: 10151.1386794418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> And, for that matter, accepting this patch by no means blocks doing
> something more sophisticated in the future.

Yeah. I think the only real argument against it is "do we really need
yet another knob?". Since Josh, who's usually the voicer of that
argument, is for this one, I don't have a problem with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-12-11 21:10:59 Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-12-11 20:31:24 Re: Extension Templates S03E11