On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 19:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, that's wrong. The missing ingredient is that the WAL log should
> explicitly log table creations. (And also table drops.) If you look
> you will find some comments showing the places where code is missing.
>
> If you try to do it as you suggest above, then you will erroneously
> recreate files that have been dropped.
OK, that makes sense. I will take another look. Thanks.
--
Marc marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com