| From: | Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c ) |
| Date: | 2002-02-28 10:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1014891273.1649.351.camel@iris |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. I'd surely be the last to claim that CVS is the be-all and end-all
> of software archiving systems. But is BitKeeper, or arch, or anything
> else enough better to justify the pain of switching? This is intended
> as an honest question, not flamebait --- I haven't looked closely at
> the alternatives.
There was a discussion on Slashdot a couple of weeks ago, with (as
usual) some interesting comments out of the lot. It's at
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=27540&threshold=4&mode=flat
including comments from Subversion's Karl Fogel.
--
Alessio F. Bragadini alessio(at)albourne(dot)com
APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750
"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-02-28 12:46:38 | Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life |
| Previous Message | Miguel A. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ar=E9valo?= | 2002-02-28 09:40:13 | Clues about tables fileformat |