From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your |
Date: | 2002-02-26 23:03:35 |
Message-ID: | 1014764615.369.6.camel@jiro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 15:30, Zak Greant wrote:
> Good Day All,
>
> eWeek has posted a poll that asks which database server is most critical
> to your organization.
The article mentions a MySQL feature which apparently improved
performance considerably:
//
MySQL 4.0.1's new, extremely fast query cache is also quite notable, as
no other database we tested had this feature. If the text of an incoming
query has a byte-for-byte match with a cached query, MySQL can retrieve
the results directly from the cache without compiling the query, getting
locks or doing index accesses. This query caching will be effective only
for tables with few updates because any table updates that clear the
cache to guarantee correct results are always returned.
//
My guess is that it would be relatively simple to implement. Any
comments on this?
If I implemented this, any chance this would make it into the tree? Of
course, it would be:
- disabled by default
- enabled on a table-by-table basis (maybe an ALTER TABLE command)
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-02-27 05:38:36 | Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your |
Previous Message | Zak Greant | 2002-02-26 20:30:41 | eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your organization? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-02-27 05:38:36 | Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your |
Previous Message | Zak Greant | 2002-02-26 20:30:41 | eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your organization? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill McGonigle | 2002-02-26 23:25:32 | Re: Is there a drawback when changing NAMEDATALEN to 64? |
Previous Message | Bill McGonigle | 2002-02-26 23:00:02 | Re: pg_dumpall storing multiple copies of DB's? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-02-26 23:20:17 | Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-26 22:33:09 | Re: Please, apply patch for contrib/tsearch |