From: | Jeff Self <jself(at)nngov(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Darley <pdarley(at)kinesis-cem(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Journaling file systems |
Date: | 2002-02-26 18:18:57 |
Message-ID: | 1014747538.14700.1.camel@personnel_test |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
There are articles over at IBM about journaled file systems. One of them
talked about incredible performance from ext3 in busy environments. The
article is here:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-fs8.html
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 11:47, Peter Darley wrote:
> Jeff (or anyone else),
> Is there some kind of file system (for Linux) that will provide better
> performance than ext2? XFS or ReiserFS maybe?
> Thanks,
> Peter Darley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Self [mailto:jself(at)nngov(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:22 AM
> To: Peter Darley
> Cc: Pgsql-Admin
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Journaling file systems
>
>
> Journaled file systems will typically slow down a database somewhat.
>
> On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 10:29, Peter Darley wrote:
> > Friends,
> > I'm wondering if a journaling file system, like ext3, will make much
> > difference with the speed or reliability of PostgreSQL? Is it worth the
> > work to switch over?
> > Thanks,
> > Peter Darley
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
> --
> Jeff Self
> Information Technology Analyst
> Department of Personnel
> City of Newport News
> 2400 Washington Ave.
> Newport News, VA 23607
> 757-926-6930
>
--
Jeff Self
Information Technology Analyst
Department of Personnel
City of Newport News
2400 Washington Ave.
Newport News, VA 23607
757-926-6930
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rohit Dewan | 2002-02-26 18:21:33 | Re: Size of database system |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-02-26 18:02:33 | Re: Size of database system |