Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brian Bruns <camber(at)ais(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation
Date: 2002-02-05 17:35:30
Message-ID: 1012930530.32211.27.camel@taru.tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 18:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brian Bruns <camber(at)ais(dot)org> writes:
> > I also noticed on the TODO list someone has put SQL*Net support as a
> > network protocol. Is this a serious plan or just a pipedream?
>
> Pipedream, I'm afraid. No one has volunteered to actually do the work,
> and I'm not sure that Oracle provides enough documentation to allow a
> compatible implementation to be built, anyhow...

Also, from what I've been told, there is no such thing as SQL*Net
protocol, there is a whole lot of different protocols that quite often
refuse to talk to each other.

------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-02-05 17:37:29 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2 Final Release
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-02-05 17:33:36 Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation