From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HASH index method not correctly handling NULL text |
Date: | 2002-02-03 03:46:31 |
Message-ID: | 1012707992.23441.10.camel@jiro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 22:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> >> The warning should be suppressed for hash indexes, since they don't
> >> include nulls. I believe this is fixed in 7.2.
>
> > Is there a reason why hash indexes don't include NULLs?
>
> Nobody's got around to fixing them to do so. AFAICS it should be easy
> enough to do; just assign a fixed hash code (zero, likely) for NULLs,
> and adjust the comparison routines to be NULL-conscious.
Okay, I'll take a look.
> But, as always, Postgres is a volunteer project, and the work that
> gets done is whatever someone is interested/motivated to work on.
> So if improving hash indexes is what floats your boat at the moment,
> then by all means go for it.
I was looking for a reasonably simple part of the backend to start
working on. If you know of an area that could use improvement, isn't too
complex and is more useful than hash indexes, please suggest it.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Martin | 2002-02-03 04:51:04 | Re: PostgreSQL transaction locking problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-03 03:09:38 | Re: HASH index method not correctly handling NULL text |