Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues
Date: 2003-04-09 21:28:45
Message-ID: 10127.1049923725@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com> writes:
> As you can imagine, at times the backup process (or in fact any large
> query that dominates the cache), tends to spike up the load pretty
> severely. At some point, we experimented with more shared memory, but
> that actually decreased overall performance, as was discussed here
> earlier.

> What can we do to alleviate this problem?

There was a great deal of discussion back in July 2000 about throttling
the rate at which pg_dump pulls down data. You might check the
archives, and also look in pg_dump.c for the comments about it therein.
No one seemed to be able to come up with a great answer that time
around, but perhaps you can find a way that works.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-04-09 21:41:21 Re: pg_dump / pg_dumpall / memory issues
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-04-09 21:13:17 Re: constraint performance