From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
Date: | 2007-04-12 23:32:43 |
Message-ID: | 10117.1176420763@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance |
Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> writes:
> ... even if I force it to use the indexes
> (enable_seqscan=off) it doesn't make it any faster really :/
Does that change the plan, or do you still get a seqscan?
BTW, how big is this table really (how many rows)?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve | 2007-04-12 23:40:15 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-12 23:29:09 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve | 2007-04-12 23:40:15 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-12 23:29:09 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve | 2007-04-12 23:40:15 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-12 23:29:09 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |