Re: Fixing r-tree semantics

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Date: 2005-06-27 15:57:51
Message-ID: 10113.1119887871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> I seem to remember there being a problem if <, <=, > and >= operators
> didn't exist and doing some operations (distinct or group by?) that
> required sorting the data type. I am not sure that you are suggesting
> that these operators be removed,

No, I wasn't.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-27 16:54:31 Re: tsearch2 vs core?
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-06-27 15:51:29 Re: For review: dbsize patch