| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dennis Vshivkov <walrus(at)amur(dot)ru>, 333854(at)bugs(dot)debian(dot)org |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug#333854: pg_group file update problems |
| Date: | 2005-10-14 15:23:56 |
| Message-ID: | 10086.1129303436@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Dennis Vshivkov <walrus(at)amur(dot)ru> writes:
> The problem is that the code that updates pg_group file resolves
> group membership through the system user catalogue cache.
Good catch.
> The attached `98-6-pg_group-stale-data-fix.patch' makes the code
> in question access the system user table directly and thus fixes
Wouldn't a CommandCounterIncrement be a much simpler solution?
Since this code is all gone in CVS tip, there's not going to be any way
of beta-testing a large patch ... and there's also not going to be a lot
of support for pushing a large, poorly tested patch into the back
branches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2005-10-14 15:24:28 | Re: BUG #1956: Plpgsql top-level DECLARE does not share |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-14 15:13:11 | Re: BUG #1964: Role membership error |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-14 15:29:30 | Re: Bug#333854: pg_group file update problems |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2005-10-14 13:45:56 | Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |