From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Initdb problem on debian mips cobalt: Bus error |
Date: | 2008-07-19 17:14:05 |
Message-ID: | 100850.85198.qm@web25807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I think so yes.
Qube/Raq2's have a RM5231 in them, whereas the Qube/Raq had a slowere RM5230 with less cache. Then the 3's moved on to the x86 platform.
A recompile with --enable-debug, then rerunning the make check gave me the same backtrace from gdb
----- Original Message ----
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
> Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July, 2008 5:42:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Initdb problem on debian mips cobalt: Bus error
>
> Glyn Astill writes:
> > Would the mips specific code behave differently on different oses?
>
> I'm more worried about there being more than one type of MIPS CPU out
> there. Do all qubes contain exactly the same sub-architecture?
> The references to "mips2" in s_lock.h are attention-getting ...
>
> regards, tom lane
__________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-07-19 19:46:29 | Re: Returns cursor? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-19 16:42:30 | Re: Initdb problem on debian mips cobalt: Bus error |