Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Date: 2016-05-06 20:24:47
Message-ID: 10073.1462566287@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Is it really sensible to group f1f5ec1ef together with the others? I
> think that one should be its own entry.

Peter seemed happy with the idea, cf
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZSOOUY3eqUZiC32he-FxycCxfV5rKots-8OF20rZgcx7g@mail.gmail.com

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-05-06 20:31:02 Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-06 20:19:52 Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump